Q: Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **Root Cause**: CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials). 🔍 **Flaw**: The function fails to strip or validate headers properly when redirecting, allowing them to follow the request to unintended origins.

Q: Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

👥 **Affected**: All OpenClaw versions prior to **2026.3.7**. 📦 **Component**: The `fetchWithSsrFGuard` function within the OpenClaw intelligent assistant core.

Q: What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

🕵️ **Hackers Can**: Intercept sensitive Authorization tokens/headers. 🔓 **Impact**: High Confidentiality loss (C:H), Low Integrity (I:L). They can impersonate users or access private data via cross-origin redirects.

Q: Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

⚡ **Threshold**: **LOW**. 🔑 **Auth**: None required (PR:N). 🖱️ **UI**: None required (UI:N). 🌐 **Access**: Network accessible (AV:N). Easy to exploit remotely!

Q: Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

🚫 **Public Exploit**: **No**. 📜 **PoCs**: The `pocs` array is empty in the data. ⚠️ **Status**: Theoretical risk based on the flaw, but no active wild exploitation confirmed yet.

Q: How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Self-Check**: Scan for OpenClaw instances running version **< 2026.3.7**. 🧪 **Test**: Monitor network traffic for `fetchWithSsrFGuard` calls that redirect to third-party domains while retaining custom headers.

Q: Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

✅ **Fixed**: **Yes**. 🔧 **Patch**: Official patch available via GitHub commit `46715371b0612a6f9114dffd1466941ac476cef5`. 📅 **Advisory**: See GHSA-6mgf-v5j7-45cr.

Q: Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

🔥 **Urgency**: **HIGH**. 📢 **Priority**: CVSS 3.1 score indicates Critical impact on Confidentiality. 🏃 **Action**: Upgrade to **2026.3.7+** immediately to prevent credential leakage!

Question 1

What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

Accepted Answer

🚨 **Essence**: OpenClaw < 2026.3.7 suffers from improper header validation in `fetchWithSsrFGuard`.
💥 **Consequences**: Custom Authorization headers leak during cross-origin redirects. Sensitive info is intercepted!…

Question 2

Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

Accepted Answer

🛡️ **Root Cause**: CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials).
🔍 **Flaw**: The function fails to strip or validate headers properly when redirecting, allowing them to follow the request to unintended origins.

Question 3

Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

Accepted Answer

👥 **Affected**: All OpenClaw versions prior to **2026.3.7**.
📦 **Component**: The `fetchWithSsrFGuard` function within the OpenClaw intelligent assistant core.

Question 4

What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

Accepted Answer

🕵️ **Hackers Can**: Intercept sensitive Authorization tokens/headers.
🔓 **Impact**: High Confidentiality loss (C:H), Low Integrity (I:L). They can impersonate users or access private data via cross-origin redirects.

Question 5

Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

Accepted Answer

⚡ **Threshold**: **LOW**.
🔑 **Auth**: None required (PR:N).
🖱️ **UI**: None required (UI:N).
🌐 **Access**: Network accessible (AV:N). Easy to exploit remotely!

Question 6

Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

Accepted Answer

🚫 **Public Exploit**: **No**.
📜 **PoCs**: The `pocs` array is empty in the data.
⚠️ **Status**: Theoretical risk based on the flaw, but no active wild exploitation confirmed yet.

Question 7

How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

Accepted Answer

🔍 **Self-Check**: Scan for OpenClaw instances running version **< 2026.3.7**.
🧪 **Test**: Monitor network traffic for `fetchWithSsrFGuard` calls that redirect to third-party domains while retaining custom headers.

Question 8

Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

Accepted Answer

✅ **Fixed**: **Yes**.
🔧 **Patch**: Official patch available via GitHub commit `46715371b0612a6f9114dffd1466941ac476cef5`.
📅 **Advisory**: See GHSA-6mgf-v5j7-45cr.

Question 9

What if no patch? (Workaround)

Accepted Answer

🛑 **No Patch Workaround**: If you cannot upgrade immediately, disable cross-origin requests or strictly whitelist redirect targets.…

Question 10

Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

Accepted Answer

🔥 **Urgency**: **HIGH**.
📢 **Priority**: CVSS 3.1 score indicates Critical impact on Confidentiality.
🏃 **Action**: Upgrade to **2026.3.7+** immediately to prevent credential leakage!

Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

CVE-2026-32913 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

Q2Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

Q3Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

Q5Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

Q6Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

Q8Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

Q9What if no patch? (Workaround)

Q10Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

Continue exploring