Question 1

What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

Accepted Answer

🚨 **Essence**: Inaba Denki Sangyo **CHOCO TEI WATCHER mini** has a **Forced Browsing** flaw.
💥 **Consequences**: Attackers can bypass permissions to access **sensitive info**.…

Question 2

Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

Accepted Answer

🛡️ **Root Cause**: **CWE-425** (Direct Request).
🔍 **Flaw**: The device fails to properly verify access rights for specific URLs or resources, allowing unauthorized traversal.

Question 3

Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

Accepted Answer

📦 **Affected Product**: **CHOCO TEI WATCHER mini** (Model: **IB-MCT001**).
🏢 **Vendor**: Inaba Denki Sangyo Co., Ltd.
📅 **Published**: March 31, 2025.

Question 4

What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

Accepted Answer

🕵️ **Hackers Can**:
1️⃣ **Bypass Auth**: Skip login screens.
2️⃣ **View Sensitive Data**: Access private surveillance feeds or config files.…

Question 5

Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

Accepted Answer

⚡ **Threshold**: **LOW**.
🔓 **Auth**: **None Required** (PR:N).
🌐 **Network**: **Remote** (AV:N).
👤 **User Interaction**: **None** (UI:N). Easy to exploit!

Question 6

Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

Accepted Answer

📜 **Public Exp?**: **Yes/Referenced**.
🔗 References include **CISA ICS Advisory** and vendor PDF.…

Question 7

How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

Accepted Answer

🔍 **Self-Check**:
1️⃣ Scan for **IB-MCT001** devices.
2️⃣ Test for **Forced Browsing** paths (e.g., admin panels, config files) without auth.…

Question 8

Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

Accepted Answer

🩹 **Official Fix**: **Yes**.
📄 Vendor released a **vulnerability PDF** (inaba.co.jp).
🏛️ **CISA** issued an advisory (ICSA-25-084-04).
✅ **Action**: Apply the vendor's patch immediately.

Question 9

What if no patch? (Workaround)

Accepted Answer

🚧 **No Patch? Workaround**:
1️⃣ **Network Segmentation**: Isolate cameras from public internet.
2️⃣ **Firewall Rules**: Block direct access to sensitive endpoints.…

Question 10

Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

Accepted Answer

🔥 **Urgency**: **CRITICAL**.
📉 **Priority**: **P0**.
⚠️ Remote, unauthenticated, high impact.
🏃 **Action**: Patch **IMMEDIATELY** to prevent remote surveillance breaches.

Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

CVE-2025-26689 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

Q2Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

Q3Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

Q5Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

Q6Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

Q8Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

Q9What if no patch? (Workaround)

Q10Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

Continue exploring