CVE-2020-10808 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

🚨 **Essence**: VestaCP allows **OS Command Injection** via crafted filenames. <br>💥 **Consequences**: Attackers can execute arbitrary code on the server.…

🛡️ **Root Cause**: Improper sanitization of **user-supplied filenames**. <br>⚠️ **Flaw**: The application passes these filenames directly to OS commands without validation, enabling injection payloads.…

📦 **Affected**: **Vesta Control Panel (VestaCP)**. <br>📅 **Versions**: **0.9.8-26 and earlier**. <br>🌐 **Type**: Open-source virtual host control panel.

💻 **Privileges**: Code execution with the privileges of the VestaCP service/user. <br>📂 **Data**: Potential access to all hosted websites, databases, and server configurations.…

🔑 **Threshold**: **Medium/High**. <br>🔒 **Auth**: Requires **Authentication** (as noted in references). <br>⚙️ **Config**: Attacker needs valid credentials to interact with the panel and inject the malicious filename.

🔓 **Public Exp**: **Yes**. <br>📜 **Sources**: Metasploit modules available (PR #13094). PacketStorm Security hosts detailed exploitation guides. Proof-of-Concepts are widely circulated.

🔍 **Self-Check**: Scan for **VestaCP** instances. <br>🧪 **Test**: If authenticated, attempt to create a user/domain with a filename containing shell metacharacters (e.g., `; ls`).…

🩹 **Fix**: Upgrade to a version **newer than 0.9.8-26**. <br>📝 **Note**: The provided data does not list a specific patch commit, but implies the vulnerability exists in versions up to 0.9.8-26.

🚧 **Workaround**: If patching is impossible: <br>1. **Restrict Access**: Block port access to VestaCP via Firewall/WAF. <br>2. **Least Privilege**: Run VestaCP under a restricted user account. <br>3.…

🔥 **Urgency**: **HIGH**. <br>⚡ **Reason**: RCE vulnerabilities are critical. Public exploits exist. Even though auth is required, many admins use weak passwords. Immediate patching or isolation is recommended.