Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1110 CNY

100%

CVE-2025-38354— drm/msm/gpu: Fix crash when throttling GPU immediately during boot

AI Predicted 4.3 Difficulty: Theoretical EPSS 0.07% · P21

Affected Version Matrix 16

VendorProductVersion RangeStatus
LinuxLinux6694482a70e9536efbf2ac233cbf0c302d6e2dae< ae2015b0dbc0eea7aaf022194371f451f784d994affected
6694482a70e9536efbf2ac233cbf0c302d6e2dae< 7946a10f8da75abc494e4bb80243e153e93e459aaffected
6694482a70e9536efbf2ac233cbf0c302d6e2dae< 1847ea44e3bdf7da8ff4158bc01b43a2e46394bdaffected
6694482a70e9536efbf2ac233cbf0c302d6e2dae< a6f673cc9488fd722c601fe020601dba14db21b2affected
6694482a70e9536efbf2ac233cbf0c302d6e2dae< b71717735be48d7743a34897e9e44a0b53e30c0eaffected
1f6c087dd6a915f1c3471f0f0f696847fc8c592faffected
9c8b3f05fb18fba12f3fca80a378c9b8f3d04cd6affected
5.18.18< 5.19affected
… +8 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2025-38354

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
drm/msm/gpu: Fix crash when throttling GPU immediately during boot
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/msm/gpu: Fix crash when throttling GPU immediately during boot There is a small chance that the GPU is already hot during boot. In that case, the call to of_devfreq_cooling_register() will immediately try to apply devfreq cooling, as seen in the following crash: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000014110 pc : a6xx_gpu_busy+0x1c/0x58 [msm] lr : msm_devfreq_get_dev_status+0xbc/0x140 [msm] Call trace: a6xx_gpu_busy+0x1c/0x58 [msm] (P) devfreq_simple_ondemand_func+0x3c/0x150 devfreq_update_target+0x44/0xd8 qos_max_notifier_call+0x30/0x84 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xa0 pm_qos_update_target+0xd0/0x110 freq_qos_apply+0x3c/0x74 apply_constraint+0x88/0x148 __dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x7c/0xcc dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x5c devfreq_cooling_set_cur_state+0x98/0xf0 __thermal_cdev_update+0x64/0xb4 thermal_cdev_update+0x4c/0x58 step_wise_manage+0x1f0/0x318 __thermal_zone_device_update+0x278/0x424 __thermal_cooling_device_register+0x2bc/0x308 thermal_of_cooling_device_register+0x10/0x1c of_devfreq_cooling_register_power+0x240/0x2bc of_devfreq_cooling_register+0x14/0x20 msm_devfreq_init+0xc4/0x1a0 [msm] msm_gpu_init+0x304/0x574 [msm] adreno_gpu_init+0x1c4/0x2e0 [msm] a6xx_gpu_init+0x5c8/0x9c8 [msm] adreno_bind+0x2a8/0x33c [msm] ... At this point we haven't initialized the GMU at all yet, so we cannot read the GMU registers inside a6xx_gpu_busy(). A similar issue was fixed before in commit 6694482a70e9 ("drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy"): msm_devfreq_init() does call devfreq_suspend_device(), but unlike msm_devfreq_suspend(), it doesn't set the df->suspended flag accordingly. This means the df->suspended flag does not match the actual devfreq state after initialization and msm_devfreq_get_dev_status() will end up accessing GMU registers, causing the crash. Fix this by setting df->suspended correctly during initialization. Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/650772/
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于msm_devfreq_get_dev_status函数在启动时立即节流GPU导致崩溃。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux 6694482a70e9536efbf2ac233cbf0c302d6e2dae ~ ae2015b0dbc0eea7aaf022194371f451f784d994 -
LinuxLinux 6.0 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2025-38354

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2025-38354

登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2025-07-25 · 114 CVEs total

CVE-2025-38426drm/amdgpu: Add basic validation for RAS header
CVE-2025-38440net/mlx5e: Fix race between DIM disable and net_dim()
CVE-2025-38438ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: Use devm_kstrdup() to avoid memleak.
CVE-2025-38437ksmbd: fix potential use-after-free in oplock/lease break ack
CVE-2025-38436drm/scheduler: signal scheduled fence when kill job
CVE-2025-38435riscv: vector: Fix context save/restore with xtheadvector
CVE-2025-38434Revert "riscv: Define TASK_SIZE_MAX for __access_ok()"
CVE-2025-38433riscv: fix runtime constant support for nommu kernels
CVE-2025-38432net: netpoll: Initialize UDP checksum field before checksumming
CVE-2025-38431smb: client: fix regression with native SMB symlinks
CVE-2025-38430nfsd: nfsd4_spo_must_allow() must check this is a v4 compound request
CVE-2025-38429bus: mhi: ep: Update read pointer only after buffer is written
CVE-2025-38428Input: ims-pcu - check record size in ims_pcu_flash_firmware()
CVE-2025-38427video: screen_info: Relocate framebuffers behind PCI bridges
CVE-2025-38425i2c: tegra: check msg length in SMBUS block read
CVE-2025-38414wifi: ath12k: fix GCC_GCC_PCIE_HOT_RST definition for WCN7850
CVE-2025-38417ice: fix eswitch code memory leak in reset scenario
CVE-2025-38416NFC: nci: uart: Set tty->disc_data only in success path
CVE-2025-38415Squashfs: check return result of sb_min_blocksize
CVE-2025-38418remoteproc: core: Release rproc->clean_table after rproc_attach() fails

Showing top 20 of 114 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2025-38354

No comments yet


Leave a comment